Non-GB languages should be reserved for the elite

Recently there has been much buzz over Microsoft's C#, Apple Computer's new version of Objective-C and some other garbage collected languages, or GB-languages (Java, C#, Lisp)  as we call them for short. It is said that they bring higher levels of productivity and what have you. The reason for abovementioned productivity is that nasty memory bugs can easier be found, and for many people this is true. However, most programmers are unintelligent.

Languages like C and assembler are very good for fast applications, but so many misuse them and then complain about lack of GC. Of course GC might be good but for fastness it is C that counts. So what should be done to solve this problem?

The US should make a law that only people above IQ 150 should be allowed use C, and maybe 170 for assembler. Then there will be no memory bugs there, and the badder programmers can use C#, new Objective-C and all that. And then actually most people can be happy. End-users don't matter much because they don't understand involved issues anyway, and high-profile developers with good brains can enjoy not having to answer stupid questions.

Pluto was never a planet

There has been debate recently about Pluto, a astronomical object that was never a planet according to correct definition. Now that that has been recorded for book-keeping, a Harvard "astronomer" protests. I have said it before and I say it again: Harvard is getting badder and badder. It never was good school and now it is even worse. It is a shame that such a shananagan institution should continue to spread wrong words and image.

Web 2.0 is nothing

Often we hear locutions such as "this is newest computer language and solves all problems", "with the new technology everybody will prosper", "this solves all problems with the world in near future", "why you are so backwards and not use this" etc. Here we refer to such as "silver bullets", things people believe is solution to everything.

Now the uninformed speak about Web 2 as the solution to everything. And again they are completely wrong and should apologize. Why?

• Wikipedia is good in some ways but not trustworthy! Anybody can write on page, even without university education! This is not tenable.
• Dating services making people forget about work and do unimportant, irrational things such as meeting strangers and engaging in sex that take away energy and potentially criminal activity.
• Blogs, even though good when used by correct people, do not convey better information than learned sources.

However this is also fault of the original creators of HTML. It is a bad standard and it will continue to create things like this.

Eric Raymond is an idiot

A couple of days ago I happen to run into a webpage which says it is blog and belongs to avowed computer programmer Eric Raymond. He tout Linux in different places (not in third world!) and quite often make some racist and reactionary remarks. He dismiss all components as "lefties". Now this time he write the follows:

Monkey feces and other forms of communication

He says he is unhappy because he must remove comments and really believe in free speech. My dear Eric, please let me ask you a question. How does what you do impede free speech. And how could deleting commentaries from a blog be considered harming to free speech. You just try to tout your political cause everywhere and you do it badly. As well, consider separating between your own world and society in big context which needs free speech.

It is strange that such bright computer programmer can be so stupid in ordinary measures.

Chewing gum

 I feel very annoyed and angry. Today when I took the train I saw two youngsters spitting chewing gum on the walkway, so I walked over and ask them what they think they are doing. The response was muck-raking. They pointed out I have very strange ethnic personality and should not intrude in strangers ways. So I try to call the police who however state they have no interest.

This makes me very unhappy. US is the most advanced country in the world, how come they accepts such blatant racism and nonsensical ways. Also how they can say that they are protecting civil liberties, against terrorism and so on? Clearly they are completely hopeless.

Mankind makes me depressed.

I am on internet

Hello. My name is Paig Saghamullit. I am male, 35 years old and not married. My interests include much everything and I think truth must hold so I point out errors when occurs such as stupid articles in newsgroup, discussion etc etc. Most people are very sloppy with facts, not check and so on so I provide correct viewpoint and point out obvious things.

I will post here every time I think there is need.