Friday, August 25, 2006
Pluto was never a planet
There has been debate recently about Pluto, a astronomical object that was never a planet according to correct definition. Now that that has been recorded for book-keeping, a Harvard "astronomer" protests. I have said it before and I say it again: Harvard is getting badder and badder. It never was good school and now it is even worse. It is a shame that such a shananagan institution should continue to spread wrong words and image.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Did you know that according to the scientific field of astrology, our solar system consists of 10 planets. The Sun is a star, and the Moon is the Earth's satellite but they too are referred to as planets, for sake of ease of use. The ten planets are in their natural order from the Sun: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.
Astrology is not science, so they can use any definition. Know maybe they will include Ceres as planet anyway. It is a degradation.
The correct definition was always there but not official. Now it is made official and the shame of calling Pluto will not go on.
Sorry, one word was lost. I meant "calling Pluto planet".
"Oh! I meant, I meant! If only, if only!"
If only my auntie had ballocks, she'd be my uncle.
Btw, can you be so kind as to reveal the correct definition of a planet, having been kept secret so long to us poor IQ 150- dudes?
RTFM:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet
It is always there and I should not have to tell you this. Don't you think rude and arrogant to continue to ask questions on this form?
Alright dude, I might have been a little pushy, it's just that the IQ business struck me as pretty silly. Chill out dude, you're in the States now man!
i need to go to US. too, my IQ is below 90 I think.
Post a Comment